It really boils down to whether the CTO is going to be a super-CIO, or part of the economic team.
Huh? (By the way, you can skip my commentary and Click Here to Vote for CTO).
Yes — I said part of the economic team. Can you really see taking a big name CEO like Eric Schmidt and telling him that his job is to try to put some cohesion and common architecture around the IT investments of the federal agencies. That ain’t gonna happen — no way, no how. He wouldn’t take it, and if he did, he wouldn’t last.
However, a Schmidt CTO role in re-invigorating the role of technology (not just IT) as the engine of American economic prowess and success is one that would fit him, or other top-drawer candidates for CTO, well. It’s an outward facing role, and if given some control over R&D budgets at critical idea factories like DARPA and NASA, it could be a functional role.
By the way — absent any kind of budgetary control — no matter what the role entails, super-CIO or economic-CTO, anyone in it will be ignored by the agencies.
I’ll share the results on Friday.
Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.