<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Shakeout in the Cloud Application Platform Industry About to Begin?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/eric-knipp/2009/08/24/is-cloud-application-platform-industry-shakeout-beginning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/eric-knipp/2009/08/24/is-cloud-application-platform-industry-shakeout-beginning/</link>
	<description>A member of the Gartner Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 22:23:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Little Fluffy Clouds</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/eric-knipp/2009/08/24/is-cloud-application-platform-industry-shakeout-beginning/comment-page-1/#comment-65</link>
		<dc:creator>Little Fluffy Clouds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 17:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/eric-knipp/?p=56#comment-65</guid>
		<description>[...] of platform enabling development of Web applications using a Cloud Computing model. A few weeks ago I blogged that the Cloud Application Platform market might be on the verge of shakeout; whether I was right or not, we should all agree that the market is young compared to the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of platform enabling development of Web applications using a Cloud Computing model. A few weeks ago I blogged that the Cloud Application Platform market might be on the verge of shakeout; whether I was right or not, we should all agree that the market is young compared to the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Knipp</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/eric-knipp/2009/08/24/is-cloud-application-platform-industry-shakeout-beginning/comment-page-1/#comment-63</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Knipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:40:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/eric-knipp/?p=56#comment-63</guid>
		<description>@Yoram - I haven&#039;t been briefed by the folks at Morph but upon first glance it looks like an APaaS. There is much differentiation from one APaaS to the next so I can&#039;t make any well-informed comments. Reviewing what is on their Web site leads me to believe that the design of the platform is similar to many other APaaS offerings.

Gartner would call &quot;blade server dedicated to the enterprise behind a firewall&quot; NOT CLOUD. However, a private cloud could be created out of a cluster of such servers provided that internally resources are provisioned to different tenants elastically and metered by use - for example, a large enterprise might offer centrally-managed private cloud services to multiple business units. Each business unit would be billed only for what they use, which would vary depending on the elastically provisioned resources. In practice I believe this is hard to achieve, but many vendors are trying to go there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Yoram &#8211; I haven&#8217;t been briefed by the folks at Morph but upon first glance it looks like an APaaS. There is much differentiation from one APaaS to the next so I can&#8217;t make any well-informed comments. Reviewing what is on their Web site leads me to believe that the design of the platform is similar to many other APaaS offerings.</p>
<p>Gartner would call &#8220;blade server dedicated to the enterprise behind a firewall&#8221; NOT CLOUD. However, a private cloud could be created out of a cluster of such servers provided that internally resources are provisioned to different tenants elastically and metered by use &#8211; for example, a large enterprise might offer centrally-managed private cloud services to multiple business units. Each business unit would be billed only for what they use, which would vary depending on the elastically provisioned resources. In practice I believe this is hard to achieve, but many vendors are trying to go there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yoram Heller</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/eric-knipp/2009/08/24/is-cloud-application-platform-industry-shakeout-beginning/comment-page-1/#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>Yoram Heller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 03:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/eric-knipp/?p=56#comment-62</guid>
		<description>just came across your blog.  was curious to see what you thought about mor.ph and the idea of the enterprise cloud ie a blade server dedicated to the enterprise behind a firewall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just came across your blog.  was curious to see what you thought about mor.ph and the idea of the enterprise cloud ie a blade server dedicated to the enterprise behind a firewall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Burns</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/eric-knipp/2009/08/24/is-cloud-application-platform-industry-shakeout-beginning/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Burns</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 20:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/eric-knipp/?p=56#comment-49</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re dead on right. There is a coming shakedown in the cloud. Those who are undercapitalized or have less functionality will likely be the first victims. www.workxpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re dead on right. There is a coming shakedown in the cloud. Those who are undercapitalized or have less functionality will likely be the first victims. <a href="http://www.workxpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.workxpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

