<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter and e-Discovery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/debra_logan/2009/04/28/twitter-and-e-discovery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/debra_logan/2009/04/28/twitter-and-e-discovery/</link>
	<description>A Member of The Gartner Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 12:18:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Brown</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/debra_logan/2009/04/28/twitter-and-e-discovery/comment-page-1/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:18:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/debra_logan/?p=8#comment-76</guid>
		<description>&quot;Everything is discoverable&quot;? Does this apply to my THOUGHTS? Just kidding, Debra. This post is great -- it&#039;s nice to see a light-hearted approach to Twitter and E-Discovery. But are you absolutely SURE the world won&#039;t end because of blogging?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Everything is discoverable&#8221;? Does this apply to my THOUGHTS? Just kidding, Debra. This post is great &#8212; it&#8217;s nice to see a light-hearted approach to Twitter and E-Discovery. But are you absolutely SURE the world won&#8217;t end because of blogging?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e-discovery 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Electronic Discovery, EDiscovery, E-Discovery, Legal Discovery</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/debra_logan/2009/04/28/twitter-and-e-discovery/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>e-discovery 2.0 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Electronic Discovery, EDiscovery, E-Discovery, Legal Discovery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/debra_logan/?p=8#comment-18</guid>
		<description>[...] Web pages? Peer-to-peer? Google? Instant messaging? As Debra Logan astutely points out in her recent post on the topic, “everything that exists is discoverable (at least pretty much).”  If you haven’t already, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Web pages? Peer-to-peer? Google? Instant messaging? As Debra Logan astutely points out in her recent post on the topic, “everything that exists is discoverable (at least pretty much).”  If you haven’t already, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jochen L. Leidner</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/debra_logan/2009/04/28/twitter-and-e-discovery/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Jochen L. Leidner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 14:46:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/debra_logan/?p=8#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Twitter posts are so short (even shorter than SMS!) that it&#039;s hard to see how one could violate copyright by posting it (fair use, substantiality in USC and US Copyright Act).

I&#039;m not at all surprised your law firm advised cautiousness, isn&#039;t that what they always do? The main question is, what&#039;s the net value, i.e. can you gain more by sharing (give and take) information faster than ever.

I totally concur with your last paragraph (e.g. a recent vice presidential candidate was said to have been using only her private Yahoo account for work, which arguably makes her actions &quot;less discoverable&quot;).

Jochen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter posts are so short (even shorter than SMS!) that it&#8217;s hard to see how one could violate copyright by posting it (fair use, substantiality in USC and US Copyright Act).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not at all surprised your law firm advised cautiousness, isn&#8217;t that what they always do? The main question is, what&#8217;s the net value, i.e. can you gain more by sharing (give and take) information faster than ever.</p>
<p>I totally concur with your last paragraph (e.g. a recent vice presidential candidate was said to have been using only her private Yahoo account for work, which arguably makes her actions &#8220;less discoverable&#8221;).</p>
<p>Jochen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Mehta</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/debra_logan/2009/04/28/twitter-and-e-discovery/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Mehta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 05:08:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/debra_logan/?p=8#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Hi Deb,

That&#039;s a great post and very topical.  I have to admit that I think businesses are struggling with a fundamental challenge.  To appeal to their customers, partners and employees, they are becoming more authentic, unfiltered and real-time, using methods like twitter.  Yet, these same factors potentially open the exposure that you describe.  Frankly though, I think the transition is inevitable because if one company avoids these new media, its competitors will not and it will lose out.

However, I agree that the authenticity and lack of control inherit in twitter will change e-discovery a great deal in the coming years.

Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Deb,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a great post and very topical.  I have to admit that I think businesses are struggling with a fundamental challenge.  To appeal to their customers, partners and employees, they are becoming more authentic, unfiltered and real-time, using methods like twitter.  Yet, these same factors potentially open the exposure that you describe.  Frankly though, I think the transition is inevitable because if one company avoids these new media, its competitors will not and it will lose out.</p>
<p>However, I agree that the authenticity and lack of control inherit in twitter will change e-discovery a great deal in the coming years.</p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

