<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Wall Street Journal Goes Business Class?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/debbie_wilson/2009/09/22/the-wall-street-journal-goes-business-class/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/debbie_wilson/2009/09/22/the-wall-street-journal-goes-business-class/</link>
	<description>A member of the Gartner Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Oct 2011 11:38:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baiju</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/debbie_wilson/2009/09/22/the-wall-street-journal-goes-business-class/comment-page-1/#comment-358</link>
		<dc:creator>Baiju</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 01:07:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/debbie_wilson/?p=159#comment-358</guid>
		<description>I got my renewal notice and it is for $225, somehow I am saving 70% they claim.  When I go to the website it is $139 for a print and online subscription.  

When I called in to say I am not renewing, the lady kept saying there was nothing she could do and I am on a introductory rate, well I guess my introductory rate has lasted about 3 years.  

I guess I will have to let the subscription lapse for a few days and sign up as a new subscriber.  

What a pain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got my renewal notice and it is for $225, somehow I am saving 70% they claim.  When I go to the website it is $139 for a print and online subscription.  </p>
<p>When I called in to say I am not renewing, the lady kept saying there was nothing she could do and I am on a introductory rate, well I guess my introductory rate has lasted about 3 years.  </p>
<p>I guess I will have to let the subscription lapse for a few days and sign up as a new subscriber.  </p>
<p>What a pain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/debbie_wilson/2009/09/22/the-wall-street-journal-goes-business-class/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 22:37:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/debbie_wilson/?p=159#comment-307</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad to see that I&#039;m not the only one. I received my renewal notice ($441.00 also) and was shocked at the rate increase. I couldn&#039;t remember what I paid last year, but after reading the above comments, it must have been $149.00. I&#039;m just not going to renew. I&#039;ve found that complaining doesn&#039;t do any good; you have to vote with your feet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad to see that I&#8217;m not the only one. I received my renewal notice ($441.00 also) and was shocked at the rate increase. I couldn&#8217;t remember what I paid last year, but after reading the above comments, it must have been $149.00. I&#8217;m just not going to renew. I&#8217;ve found that complaining doesn&#8217;t do any good; you have to vote with your feet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karin Wacaser</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/debbie_wilson/2009/09/22/the-wall-street-journal-goes-business-class/comment-page-1/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Karin Wacaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:54:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/debbie_wilson/?p=159#comment-261</guid>
		<description>The same thing happened at the Dallas Morning News. Last year I paid $130/year, this year my renewal rate is $360/year! (I cancelled!) They said the higher rate is due to the loss of car dealer advertising. 
I also received a WSJ promotion for $120/year, and couldn&#039;t believe I could actually get the WSJ for much cheaper than my local paper. Crazy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same thing happened at the Dallas Morning News. Last year I paid $130/year, this year my renewal rate is $360/year! (I cancelled!) They said the higher rate is due to the loss of car dealer advertising.<br />
I also received a WSJ promotion for $120/year, and couldn&#8217;t believe I could actually get the WSJ for much cheaper than my local paper. Crazy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leah</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/debbie_wilson/2009/09/22/the-wall-street-journal-goes-business-class/comment-page-1/#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/debbie_wilson/?p=159#comment-256</guid>
		<description>I just went through the same exact thing and just got off the phone with WSJ subscription services. They are forwarding my comments to Marktg.  Meanwhile, there is a student rate,  and since my son is a student and the subscriber, I think we will be trying that route. There is no way in he** I would pay $441.00.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just went through the same exact thing and just got off the phone with WSJ subscription services. They are forwarding my comments to Marktg.  Meanwhile, there is a student rate,  and since my son is a student and the subscriber, I think we will be trying that route. There is no way in he** I would pay $441.00.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debbie Wilson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/debbie_wilson/2009/09/22/the-wall-street-journal-goes-business-class/comment-page-1/#comment-230</link>
		<dc:creator>Debbie Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 14:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/debbie_wilson/?p=159#comment-230</guid>
		<description>Here is a postscript - my son&#039;s middle school is running a magazine subscription fundraiser.  In it they offered the WSJ for $49 for 6 months, even for renewals.  I signed up - the price was right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a postscript &#8211; my son&#8217;s middle school is running a magazine subscription fundraiser.  In it they offered the WSJ for $49 for 6 months, even for renewals.  I signed up &#8211; the price was right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allison Tobin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/debbie_wilson/2009/09/22/the-wall-street-journal-goes-business-class/comment-page-1/#comment-229</link>
		<dc:creator>Allison Tobin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/debbie_wilson/?p=159#comment-229</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting that, Debbie. it is outrageous that they would even consider tripling a subcriber&#039;s rate, let alone actually do it. print pubs are having a hard time i know but if you ask me, this will just make things harder for them--as they lose loyal subscribers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting that, Debbie. it is outrageous that they would even consider tripling a subcriber&#8217;s rate, let alone actually do it. print pubs are having a hard time i know but if you ask me, this will just make things harder for them&#8211;as they lose loyal subscribers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention The Wall Street Journal Goes Business Class? -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/debbie_wilson/2009/09/22/the-wall-street-journal-goes-business-class/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The Wall Street Journal Goes Business Class? -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:04:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/debbie_wilson/?p=159#comment-227</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by emexec, Denise Lee Yohn and Erin McElveen. Erin McElveen said: One reason the newspaper industry is in trouble: sneaky marketing and inflated (WSJ) prices: http://bit.ly/qF8QA (RT@mjasay) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by emexec, Denise Lee Yohn and Erin McElveen. Erin McElveen said: One reason the newspaper industry is in trouble: sneaky marketing and inflated (WSJ) prices: <a href="http://bit.ly/qF8QA" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/qF8QA</a> (RT@mjasay) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: denise lee yohn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/debbie_wilson/2009/09/22/the-wall-street-journal-goes-business-class/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>denise lee yohn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/debbie_wilson/?p=159#comment-226</guid>
		<description>it&#039;s too bad that so many companies like the wsj take their current, loyal customers for granted and try to gouge them with higher fees than those they offer to prospects -- plus, it seems they&#039;re assuming most readers wouldn&#039;t figure out what they&#039;re doing or be too lazy to do protest -- they don&#039;t realize how savvy and powerful customers are these days!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s too bad that so many companies like the wsj take their current, loyal customers for granted and try to gouge them with higher fees than those they offer to prospects &#8212; plus, it seems they&#8217;re assuming most readers wouldn&#8217;t figure out what they&#8217;re doing or be too lazy to do protest &#8212; they don&#8217;t realize how savvy and powerful customers are these days!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

