<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Listening to the Process Owner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/dave_mccoy/2009/06/30/listening-to-the-process-owner/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/dave_mccoy/2009/06/30/listening-to-the-process-owner/</link>
	<description>A member of the Gartner Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:51:23 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David McCoy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/dave_mccoy/2009/06/30/listening-to-the-process-owner/comment-page-1/#comment-3066</link>
		<dc:creator>David McCoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 02:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/dave_mccoy/2009/06/30/listening-to-the-process-owner/#comment-3066</guid>
		<description>Marty

I just came back from a trip where I saw the same issue in a government setting.  The &quot;process owner&quot; designee would have nothing to do with the role. This was freezing the entire forward motion on the BPM project, as would be expected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marty</p>
<p>I just came back from a trip where I saw the same issue in a government setting.  The &#8220;process owner&#8221; designee would have nothing to do with the role. This was freezing the entire forward motion on the BPM project, as would be expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty Grubin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/dave_mccoy/2009/06/30/listening-to-the-process-owner/comment-page-1/#comment-3064</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty Grubin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/dave_mccoy/2009/06/30/listening-to-the-process-owner/#comment-3064</guid>
		<description>I have had a very difficult time getting organizations to adopt a true process owner mentality.  It is often too political for all orgs to agree on the scope of responsibilities or the role is &quot;watered down&quot; to a reporting postion without any authority to remedy issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have had a very difficult time getting organizations to adopt a true process owner mentality.  It is often too political for all orgs to agree on the scope of responsibilities or the role is &#8220;watered down&#8221; to a reporting postion without any authority to remedy issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links 07/02/2009</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/dave_mccoy/2009/06/30/listening-to-the-process-owner/comment-page-1/#comment-3055</link>
		<dc:creator>Links 07/02/2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 07:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/dave_mccoy/2009/06/30/listening-to-the-process-owner/#comment-3055</guid>
		<description>[...] Listening to the Process Owner [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Listening to the Process Owner [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
