Brian Prentice

A member of the Gartner Blog Network

Brian Prentice
Research VP
9 years at Gartner
26 years IT industry

Brian Prentice is a research vice president and focuses on emerging technologies and trends with an emphasis on those that impact an organization's software and application strategy... Read Full Bio

Coverage Areas:

Collective Competency – The Underlying Trend Driving Open Source

by Brian Prentice  |  October 25, 2009  |  10 Comments

I have long held the view that the Open Source license agreement has been one of the most disruptive ideas to have hit the IT industry. The core concept of providing non-discriminatory modification and re-distribution rights within a copyright agreement has been, and continues to be, as great an innovation as any single piece of technology. But over the years that I’ve been researching Open Source I’ve been wondering whether it is actually part of some other, bigger, disruptive trend.

While so much interest has been put on the pricing and commercial dynamics of Open Source, I’ve found myself continually drawn to its other significant business value proposition. That’s the way its been used to normalize distortions in a value chain system.

Modern Western business models have long since moved on from the concept of vertical integration. For the last two decades the driving philosophy has been “core competency.” Organizations which focus on core competency are ultimately bound together in what Michael Porter called a Value Chain System.

But this business control system has a inherent risk. Should an organization monopolize a specific segment of a value chain system they can extract a higher percentage of its total proceeds. If the product, or service, in question is price elastic than those additional proceeds will come from other participants in the value chain system.

What then does a CEO do when facing a squeeze on their profits because a direct, or downstream, supplier is dominating a segment of the value chain system? Besides negotiating a better deal – if they can – they’ve been left with little choice but to get directly into that segment of the value chain system themselves. But by doing so their organization is distracted from focusing on its own core competency.

The risk of such an undertaking can be mitigated if there is a collective response by similarly affected members of the value chain system. After all, it is usually a shared problem. But collective responses have always had an inherent, and often fatal, flaw. Who owns the resulting assets? Either organizations enter into complex joint venture agreements to sort this out or run the risk of shifting the distortion in the value chain system to another organization.

What’s now being recognized is that there’s another option. Seek a collective response to a shared problem and make sure no one owns, or can control, the resulting assets. When the assets in question are intellectual property this becomes quite achievable. The solution, therefore, is the creation of collectively-owned assets as opposed to entity-specific assets.

The strategic decision frameworks and ongoing tactical efforts needed to create collectively-owned assets is something I’m calling Collective Competency (Gartner clients can read the associated research note – “Collective Competency: A New Business Pattern“). It doesn’t replace core competency. But what’s being realized is that core competency must be augmented by collective competency to be a sustainable model.

What’s interesting to note is that mechanisms to create collectively owned assets across the major types of intellectual property classes have emerged. Open Source and Creative Commons licenses are examples of collectively-owned copyright assets. Patent commons such as Eco-Patent Commons create collectively-own patent assets. And industry-specific standards organizations like 1SYNC and ACORD are resulting in transparent, standardized process and semantic definitions that previously would have been seen as organization-specific trade secrets.

In this broader context, Open Source is essentially an IT-industry specific instantiation of Collective Competency. And that, in part, explains why Open Source is becoming dominated by proprietary vendors. It’s because they are the ones that most acutely appreciate the existing or potential value chain system distortions that can impact their businesses.

10 Comments »

Category: Uncategorized     Tags:

10 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Collective Competency – The Underlying Trend Driving Open Source | Open Hacking   October 26, 2009 at 2:54 am

    [...] is the original: Collective Competency – The Underlying Trend Driving Open Source This entry was posted on Sunday, October 25th, 2009 at 9:39 pm and is filed under News, [...]

  • 2 Tweets that mention Collective Competency – The Underlying Trend Driving Open Source -- Topsy.com   October 26, 2009 at 8:11 am

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Gartner and Totto, Thilo Specht. Thilo Specht said: Recommended Reading: Collective competency – the underlying trend driving open source http://tinyurl.com/ygbztj6 [...]

  • 3 FredericBaud   October 26, 2009 at 9:10 am

    Instead of the Core Competency’s framework, I believe that the notion of Open Source can probably be better grasped thanks to the Resource Based View of the firm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Resource-based_view

    A competitive advantage can be gained when a firm has secured a set of unique resources providing a superior position. The role of resource based strategy is to identify the most important resources and find a course of actions to build or acquire these unique resources.

    While patents have artificially created unique resources giving an undue advantage to some companies. Open source has proved that intellectual property have a superior return for society and most participating firms when shared and handled as a common resource.

  • 4 Filipe Pinto   October 26, 2009 at 9:29 am

    Sometimes i have the impression that Gartner is re-inventing the wheel.

    The world “Collective” is a word full of meanings – economical, judicial,philosophical, biological… (a clue for deep research)

    The world works better when more than one agent are responsible for a given process. Whether that process is to supply you clean water, or is an epistemic process responsible to create your next OS. Ecosystem (chain) diversity is key for the future.

    Do you think that it would make sense for Gartner, to start having a multidisciplinary group (including biology, philosophy, economy), to review any new thoughts, and map them to their originals and to whom is carrying their investigation these days?

    Wouldn’t that save money, and increase quality and margins? Like Porter would say – key strategic differentiators?

    Maybe you would like to watch this youTube of Richard Dawkins interviewing Dan Dennett -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5lfTPTFN94o&feature=player_embedded

  • 5 Links 10/27/2009   October 27, 2009 at 3:30 am

    [...] Collective Competency – The Underlying Trend Driving Open Source [...]

  • 6 Brian Prentice   October 27, 2009 at 7:26 am

    FredricBaud – good to hear from you again. I’ve been a bit busy so I haven’t been able to dedicate the time for a proper read of link on the Resource Based View of the organization. It looks like some interesting stuff and I can see where you’re coming from in drawing a connection with open source. Having said that I think it is a different concept than what i am trying to highlight with Collective Competency.

  • 7 uberVU - social comments   October 27, 2009 at 2:43 pm

    Social comments and analytics for this post…

    This post was mentioned on Twitter by tspe: Recommended Reading: Collective competency – the underlying trend driving open source http://tinyurl.com/ygbztj6

  • 8 Jason Brooks (jasonbrooks) 's status on Monday, 02-Nov-09 17:06:47 UTC - Identi.ca   November 2, 2009 at 1:06 pm

    [...] http://blogs.gartner.com/brian_prentice/2009/10/25/collective-competency-the-underlying-trend-drivi… a few seconds ago from web [...]

  • 9 Open Source & Business Apps – Is There A Disconnect?   November 3, 2009 at 1:46 am

    [...] ← Collective Competency – The Underlying Trend Driving Open Source [...]

  • 10 Patent Cross-LIcensing & Open Source – Two Sides of the Same Coin?   February 19, 2010 at 2:55 am

    [...] Context, on the flip side, is everything that is not core. And, to Moore’s point, organizations seek to extract resources in these areas. Open source has unique value in achieving that objective. There are few mechanisms more successful than open source in remove price and supplier distortions that make resource extraction difficult, if not impossible. But where patents underpin open innovation, open source underpins shared commoditization. Or, as I define it, patents are critical to achieving core competency while open source is critical in achieving collective competency. [...]