<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patent Reform Act or Patent Patronage Act?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/brian_prentice/2009/04/07/patent-reform-act-or-patent-patronage-act/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/brian_prentice/2009/04/07/patent-reform-act-or-patent-patronage-act/</link>
	<description>A member of the Gartner Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 15:44:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patent Reform Ideas - Rethinking The Review Process</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/brian_prentice/2009/04/07/patent-reform-act-or-patent-patronage-act/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Patent Reform Ideas - Rethinking The Review Process</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 23:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/brian_prentice/2009/04/07/patent-reform-act-or-patent-patronage-act/#comment-137</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8592; Patent Reform Act or Patent Patronage Act? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &larr; Patent Reform Act or Patent Patronage Act? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

