by Bill Pray | January 9, 2013 | Comments Off on Evaluating SaaS: What are the Buckets?
It is interesting to note that the term bucket is used in several ways with technology. Wikipedia lists the technical uses of the term bucket.
Bucket is also a useful metaphor when trying to figure out how to evaluate a software as a service (SaaS) provider and solution. What are the “buckets” for evaluation requirements? As the Wikipedia article states: “A bucket must exist before anything can be put into it.”
The buckets for an IT professional are a bit different than some of the counterparts in an enterprise – e.g. the legal team or purchasing – when evaluating SaaS providers and solutions.
In my conversations with enterprises, the most common buckets that IT professionals create for SaaS evaluation criteria are:
- Business criteria
- Pricing and billing
- Service levels and service level agreements
- Support and communication
- Technical criteria
Putting criteria into these buckets then becomes a time consuming and significant undertaking – an exercise that I have been working on for that last several months. Keep in mind, this list excludes the SaaS solution specific buckets such as user experience, clients, solution features, and mobile support.
The key is to ensure it doesn’t become “bit buckets”, as defined by Wikipedia as someplace where something goes to disappear irreversibly, but rather “documentation buckets” in which criteria can be added or modified based on the latest information and requirements.
Read Complimentary Relevant Research
Cloud Computing Primer for 2017
Cloud has evolved from a disruption to an expected approach to traditional as well as next-generation IT. Our research helps IT leaders,...
View Relevant Webinars
Data Centers and Cloud Strategies: Working Together to Drive Business Growth
After decades of owning and managing data centers, today's enterprise must grapple with the issues of how to support older applications,...
Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.