Gartner Blog Network


The Conundrum of Two Intelligences!

by Anton Chuvakin  |  January 15, 2014  |  4 Comments

I got it! I think I understood why so many security discussions around the topic of “intelligence” (be it the clearer “threat intelligence” or dramatically confusing “security intelligence”) go so awry so quickly.

Compare these two quotes:

  1. “Data is not information, information is not knowledge, knowledge is not intelligence, intelligence is not wisdom.” (uses this definition)
  2. “The National Security Agency (NSA) is the main producer and manager of signals intelligence (SIGINT) for the United States.” (uses this definition)

Hilarity ensues when two infosec professionals engage in a heated discussion about intelligence, one using #1 concept and the other using the #2. Just think about it and imagine (or, more likely, recall) the conversation that went like this:

A: “We want intelligence-based security!” (thinking that of better quality information and decisions)

B: “What are you talking about? We won’t create our own TAO team here; we just want to be secure” (thinking of the NSA)

A: “Don’t you want to be more intelligent in what you do?”

B: “Well, yes. But we don’t need an intelligence agency to protect our secrets…”

and so on…

So, the lesson here is CLARITY!!!

Posts related to this research project:

Category: philosophy  security  threat-intelligence  

Anton Chuvakin
Research VP and Distinguished Analyst
5+ years with Gartner
17 years IT industry

Anton Chuvakin is a Research VP and Distinguished Analyst at Gartner's GTP Security and Risk Management group. Before Mr. Chuvakin joined Gartner, his job responsibilities included security product management, evangelist… Read Full Bio


Thoughts on The Conundrum of Two Intelligences!


  1. Matt says:

    People and organisations need to make sense of what’s going on around them in order to maintain or improve the position they represent. The processes used to undertake this are very dependent on the environment whether it’s military, civilian, IT, team sports etc etc. This ‘making sense’ is intelligence and it’s less about being good at what you do (that helps) and more about knowing who your opponents are, their capabilities and goals and their elected methods.

    The alternative is to bury your head in the sand and then wonder why you just got turned over.

  2. @Matt Thanks for the comment.

    That is a very useful way to put it: intelligence = making sense (vs the fave pastime of many orgs – BUYING BOXES)

    >bury your head in the sand and then wonder why you just got turned over.

    This obviously made my day :-)

  3. […] The Conundrum of Two Intelligences! […]



Comments are closed

Comments or opinions expressed on this blog are those of the individual contributors only, and do not necessarily represent the views of Gartner, Inc. or its management. Readers may copy and redistribute blog postings on other blogs, or otherwise for private, non-commercial or journalistic purposes, with attribution to Gartner. This content may not be used for any other purposes in any other formats or media. The content on this blog is provided on an "as-is" basis. Gartner shall not be liable for any damages whatsoever arising out of the content or use of this blog.