<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What If Social Software Killed Our Ability To Communicate?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/06/what-if-social-software-killed-our-ability-to-communicate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/06/what-if-social-software-killed-our-ability-to-communicate/</link>
	<description>A member of the Gartner Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:26:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: social software</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/06/what-if-social-software-killed-our-ability-to-communicate/comment-page-1/#comment-1694</link>
		<dc:creator>social software</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 05:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/06/what-if-social-software-killed-our-ability-to-communicate/#comment-1694</guid>
		<description>Online networking has gained in popularity over the past few years using online social networking software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Online networking has gained in popularity over the past few years using online social networking software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: François Banville</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/06/what-if-social-software-killed-our-ability-to-communicate/comment-page-1/#comment-1230</link>
		<dc:creator>François Banville</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 11:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/06/what-if-social-software-killed-our-ability-to-communicate/#comment-1230</guid>
		<description>Actually, I believe that the English language has more to loose than any other language with the effect of social software. Here is my argument.

Most languages evolve and adopt new terms to describe new concepts. For example, we use the word &quot;courriel&quot; in Quebec to refer to email. It is derived from &quot;courrier électronique&quot;. The rate of adoption of new terms is much slower than the rate at which new concepts become popular. So an English word is used while semantic catches up. Eventually, the language heals itself. 

On the other hand, social software forces a large proportion of the population to use English to effectively communicate with one another. With so many people speaking and writing a very basic English, with a very limited vocabulary and questionable grammar, a less than correct form of English becomes prevalent. I offer my prose as a proof of this statement... Eventually the language degrades to a pidgin English that corresponds to the lowest common form of English that everyone can share. It is not clear to me if English can recovers. The fact we use English as a common language is thus a blessing and a curse for the people who still learn it as a mother tongue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I believe that the English language has more to loose than any other language with the effect of social software. Here is my argument.</p>
<p>Most languages evolve and adopt new terms to describe new concepts. For example, we use the word &#8220;courriel&#8221; in Quebec to refer to email. It is derived from &#8220;courrier électronique&#8221;. The rate of adoption of new terms is much slower than the rate at which new concepts become popular. So an English word is used while semantic catches up. Eventually, the language heals itself. </p>
<p>On the other hand, social software forces a large proportion of the population to use English to effectively communicate with one another. With so many people speaking and writing a very basic English, with a very limited vocabulary and questionable grammar, a less than correct form of English becomes prevalent. I offer my prose as a proof of this statement&#8230; Eventually the language degrades to a pidgin English that corresponds to the lowest common form of English that everyone can share. It is not clear to me if English can recovers. The fact we use English as a common language is thus a blessing and a curse for the people who still learn it as a mother tongue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paolo Magrassi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/06/what-if-social-software-killed-our-ability-to-communicate/comment-page-1/#comment-1227</link>
		<dc:creator>Paolo Magrassi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 07:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/06/what-if-social-software-killed-our-ability-to-communicate/#comment-1227</guid>
		<description>Nick, unfortunately you’ re right. All languages evolve bottom-up. And daily use in most of the cases tends to deteriorate a language, because it lowers the number of rich syntactical constructs, eventually impoverishing expressiveness.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick, unfortunately you’ re right. All languages evolve bottom-up. And daily use in most of the cases tends to deteriorate a language, because it lowers the number of rich syntactical constructs, eventually impoverishing expressiveness.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Jones</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/06/what-if-social-software-killed-our-ability-to-communicate/comment-page-1/#comment-1219</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:23:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/06/what-if-social-software-killed-our-ability-to-communicate/#comment-1219</guid>
		<description>Another thought about defending language. It&#039;s arguable that you&#039;re not defending it, but trying to prevent it evolving. The English language is an amazing cocktail of words originating from dozens of other languages and cultures. The development of English is in a sense very democratic because it has been created by the people who speak it, not by a committee who decide if new words are permitted and appropriate. It isn&#039;t pure, and the grammar is a mess, but it&#039;s certainly expressive.

I&#039;m very suspicious of official attempts to maintain the purity of  language. Many years ago I lived in Swansea, in South Wales. Although part of Wales, Swansea was historically never a Welsh speaking area as most of its inhabitants arrived from other parts of England in the industrial revolution. But the local politicians decided that as it was in Wales they must have bilingual road signs. Unfortunately, many places had never had Welsh names, because their inhabitants didn&#039;t speak Welsh. So they had to form a committee whose job was to invent Welsh place names so they could put them on the signs. This is the sort of Pythonesque activity that results when you meddle with the evolution of a language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thought about defending language. It&#8217;s arguable that you&#8217;re not defending it, but trying to prevent it evolving. The English language is an amazing cocktail of words originating from dozens of other languages and cultures. The development of English is in a sense very democratic because it has been created by the people who speak it, not by a committee who decide if new words are permitted and appropriate. It isn&#8217;t pure, and the grammar is a mess, but it&#8217;s certainly expressive.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very suspicious of official attempts to maintain the purity of  language. Many years ago I lived in Swansea, in South Wales. Although part of Wales, Swansea was historically never a Welsh speaking area as most of its inhabitants arrived from other parts of England in the industrial revolution. But the local politicians decided that as it was in Wales they must have bilingual road signs. Unfortunately, many places had never had Welsh names, because their inhabitants didn&#8217;t speak Welsh. So they had to form a committee whose job was to invent Welsh place names so they could put them on the signs. This is the sort of Pythonesque activity that results when you meddle with the evolution of a language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Jones</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/06/what-if-social-software-killed-our-ability-to-communicate/comment-page-1/#comment-1218</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 16:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/06/what-if-social-software-killed-our-ability-to-communicate/#comment-1218</guid>
		<description>I agree with Paolo, but the problem is the signal to noise ratio is deteriorating. There may be more people who can write well, but finding them is getting harder. 

Also, when I read your example my first reaction was that it was an example of auto-translation. This is beginning to feel like an inverse Turing test. I.e. I can no longer distinguish the person from the computer, but sadly because the person has deteriorated, not because the computer has improved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Paolo, but the problem is the signal to noise ratio is deteriorating. There may be more people who can write well, but finding them is getting harder. </p>
<p>Also, when I read your example my first reaction was that it was an example of auto-translation. This is beginning to feel like an inverse Turing test. I.e. I can no longer distinguish the person from the computer, but sadly because the person has deteriorated, not because the computer has improved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paolo Magrassi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/06/what-if-social-software-killed-our-ability-to-communicate/comment-page-1/#comment-1217</link>
		<dc:creator>Paolo Magrassi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 07:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/06/what-if-social-software-killed-our-ability-to-communicate/#comment-1217</guid>
		<description>The people you allude to, who twit instead of talking and blog instead of writing, existed all the time in history. The only difference is that, with the internet, they have means of public expression. (Their noise is sometime entertaining but mostly tiresome, and hinders our ability to find the right stuff on the otherwise marvellous Net).
However, people who can write and talk decently are still aorund, possibily in a greater fraction than in 1990.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The people you allude to, who twit instead of talking and blog instead of writing, existed all the time in history. The only difference is that, with the internet, they have means of public expression. (Their noise is sometime entertaining but mostly tiresome, and hinders our ability to find the right stuff on the otherwise marvellous Net).<br />
However, people who can write and talk decently are still aorund, possibily in a greater fraction than in 1990.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

