<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here Comes More E-Government Benchmarking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/</link>
	<description>A member of the Gartner Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:26:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 and benchmarking &#171; The Great E-mancipator</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/comment-page-1/#comment-4314</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0 and benchmarking &#171; The Great E-mancipator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 21:22:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/#comment-4314</guid>
		<description>[...] other July post from Andrea picks up on the issue of another contract from the EC to CapGemini to do yet another round of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] other July post from Andrea picks up on the issue of another contract from the EC to CapGemini to do yet another round of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Year in Review: Top Ten for Government 2.0 in 2009</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/comment-page-1/#comment-3104</link>
		<dc:creator>A Year in Review: Top Ten for Government 2.0 in 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 11:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/#comment-3104</guid>
		<description>[...] This being said, the declaration articulates a rather compelling vision, pressing all the right buttons, from user-driven services to the importance of public information and open government. Unfortunately the suggested implementation mechanisms are the same we have seen in previous declarations and there is no clear attempt at trying something new. Studies, best practice exchanges, R&amp;D activities, call for open standards and open source are all good things, but should we judge their potential from the lack of EU e-government accomplishments in the past, I would not hold my breath here. At most, we’ll see another round of questionable EU-wide e-government benchmarks. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This being said, the declaration articulates a rather compelling vision, pressing all the right buttons, from user-driven services to the importance of public information and open government. Unfortunately the suggested implementation mechanisms are the same we have seen in previous declarations and there is no clear attempt at trying something new. Studies, best practice exchanges, R&amp;D activities, call for open standards and open source are all good things, but should we judge their potential from the lack of EU e-government accomplishments in the past, I would not hold my breath here. At most, we’ll see another round of questionable EU-wide e-government benchmarks. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ¿Tenemos las señales correctas sobre qué hacer en el Gobierno Electrónico? &#171; Apuntes electrónicos</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/comment-page-1/#comment-1727</link>
		<dc:creator>¿Tenemos las señales correctas sobre qué hacer en el Gobierno Electrónico? &#171; Apuntes electrónicos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 04:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/#comment-1727</guid>
		<description>[...] además establecer una dirección de avance. Otros han recogido previamente también esta carencia (Di Maio, Osimo, ..). Un resumen de estas carencias [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] además establecer una dirección de avance. Otros han recogido previamente también esta carencia (Di Maio, Osimo, ..). Un resumen de estas carencias [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 May Harm E-Government Leaders</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/comment-page-1/#comment-1474</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0 May Harm E-Government Leaders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/#comment-1474</guid>
		<description>[...] so much so that it has been ranked number one in the EU e-government benchmark: some of you know my position about benchmarks in this area, but still it is the recognition of significant progress. With a solid, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] so much so that it has been ranked number one in the EU e-government benchmark: some of you know my position about benchmarks in this area, but still it is the recognition of significant progress. With a solid, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david osimo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/comment-page-1/#comment-1193</link>
		<dc:creator>david osimo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/#comment-1193</guid>
		<description>The problem is the obsession with longitudinal data. Like we could any kind of econometric analysis on such qualitative data. So they don&#039;t want to change - although there will be some pilot which are potentially interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is the obsession with longitudinal data. Like we could any kind of econometric analysis on such qualitative data. So they don&#8217;t want to change &#8211; although there will be some pilot which are potentially interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why IT Could Derail Government 2.0</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/comment-page-1/#comment-1187</link>
		<dc:creator>Why IT Could Derail Government 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/#comment-1187</guid>
		<description>[...] we too) who have been relentlessly advising about the virtue of e-government? What about all those e-government rankings, from all corners of the world proving that the greater the “e” in e-government, the better off [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we too) who have been relentlessly advising about the virtue of e-government? What about all those e-government rankings, from all corners of the world proving that the greater the “e” in e-government, the better off [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick Phythian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/comment-page-1/#comment-1184</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick Phythian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/#comment-1184</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree more! What a waste of public money...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more! What a waste of public money&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

