<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here Comes More E-Government Benchmarking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/</link>
	<description>A member of the Gartner Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:34:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ¿Tenemos las señales correctas sobre qué hacer en el Gobierno Electrónico? &#171; Apuntes electrónicos</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/comment-page-1/#comment-1727</link>
		<dc:creator>¿Tenemos las señales correctas sobre qué hacer en el Gobierno Electrónico? &#171; Apuntes electrónicos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 04:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/#comment-1727</guid>
		<description>[...] además establecer una dirección de avance. Otros han recogido previamente también esta carencia (Di Maio, Osimo, ..). Un resumen de estas carencias [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] además establecer una dirección de avance. Otros han recogido previamente también esta carencia (Di Maio, Osimo, ..). Un resumen de estas carencias [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web 2.0 May Harm E-Government Leaders</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/comment-page-1/#comment-1474</link>
		<dc:creator>Web 2.0 May Harm E-Government Leaders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/#comment-1474</guid>
		<description>[...] so much so that it has been ranked number one in the EU e-government benchmark: some of you know my position about benchmarks in this area, but still it is the recognition of significant progress. With a solid, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] so much so that it has been ranked number one in the EU e-government benchmark: some of you know my position about benchmarks in this area, but still it is the recognition of significant progress. With a solid, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david osimo</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/comment-page-1/#comment-1193</link>
		<dc:creator>david osimo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 11:10:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/#comment-1193</guid>
		<description>The problem is the obsession with longitudinal data. Like we could any kind of econometric analysis on such qualitative data. So they don&#039;t want to change - although there will be some pilot which are potentially interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem is the obsession with longitudinal data. Like we could any kind of econometric analysis on such qualitative data. So they don&#8217;t want to change &#8211; although there will be some pilot which are potentially interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why IT Could Derail Government 2.0</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/comment-page-1/#comment-1187</link>
		<dc:creator>Why IT Could Derail Government 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:33:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/#comment-1187</guid>
		<description>[...] we too) who have been relentlessly advising about the virtue of e-government? What about all those e-government rankings, from all corners of the world proving that the greater the “e” in e-government, the better off [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we too) who have been relentlessly advising about the virtue of e-government? What about all those e-government rankings, from all corners of the world proving that the greater the “e” in e-government, the better off [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mick Phythian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/comment-page-1/#comment-1184</link>
		<dc:creator>Mick Phythian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 07:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/02/here-comes-more-e-government-benchmarking/#comment-1184</guid>
		<description>Couldn&#039;t agree more! What a waste of public money...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Couldn&#8217;t agree more! What a waste of public money&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
