<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cloud Computing in Government: Private, Public, Both or None?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/01/cloud-computing-in-government-private-public-both-or-none/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/01/cloud-computing-in-government-private-public-both-or-none/</link>
	<description>A member of the Gartner Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 19:34:06 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: US Government Launches Cloud Application Store, But The Toughest Questions Remain Unanswered</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/01/cloud-computing-in-government-private-public-both-or-none/comment-page-1/#comment-1636</link>
		<dc:creator>US Government Launches Cloud Application Store, But The Toughest Questions Remain Unanswered</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/01/cloud-computing-in-government-private-public-both-or-none/#comment-1636</guid>
		<description>[...] privacy and procurement, will definitely help, but it is the enterprise-wide governance bit where most shared service initiatives have failed or struggled in the past. Why should the federal cloud initiative be any different?   [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] privacy and procurement, will definitely help, but it is the enterprise-wide governance bit where most shared service initiatives have failed or struggled in the past. Why should the federal cloud initiative be any different?   [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lack of Money Pushes Local Governments Into the Clouds</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/01/cloud-computing-in-government-private-public-both-or-none/comment-page-1/#comment-1279</link>
		<dc:creator>Lack of Money Pushes Local Governments Into the Clouds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:41:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/01/cloud-computing-in-government-private-public-both-or-none/#comment-1279</guid>
		<description>[...] E-discovery, reliability, security are typical concerns voiced by government clients who feel that private rather than public cloud services are more appropriate to run sensitive workloads (see Gartner research note, subscription [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] E-discovery, reliability, security are typical concerns voiced by government clients who feel that private rather than public cloud services are more appropriate to run sensitive workloads (see Gartner research note, subscription [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Public And Private Cloud Computing in Government: Balancing Act or Battlefield?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/01/cloud-computing-in-government-private-public-both-or-none/comment-page-1/#comment-1266</link>
		<dc:creator>Public And Private Cloud Computing in Government: Balancing Act or Battlefield?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 10:42:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/01/cloud-computing-in-government-private-public-both-or-none/#comment-1266</guid>
		<description>[...] We have covered some of these issues in a recent Gartner research note. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We have covered some of these issues in a recent Gartner research note. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wishing My American Friends A Great Independence Day</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/01/cloud-computing-in-government-private-public-both-or-none/comment-page-1/#comment-1206</link>
		<dc:creator>Wishing My American Friends A Great Independence Day</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 17:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/01/cloud-computing-in-government-private-public-both-or-none/#comment-1206</guid>
		<description>[...] government. Messages about &#8220;open data&#8220;, &#8220;transparent by default&#8221; or &#8220;cloud computing&#8221; have mobilized formidable brainpower across government. CIOs and administrators tweet about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] government. Messages about &#8220;open data&#8220;, &#8220;transparent by default&#8221; or &#8220;cloud computing&#8221; have mobilized formidable brainpower across government. CIOs and administrators tweet about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why IT Could Derail Government 2.0</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/01/cloud-computing-in-government-private-public-both-or-none/comment-page-1/#comment-1190</link>
		<dc:creator>Why IT Could Derail Government 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 10:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/07/01/cloud-computing-in-government-private-public-both-or-none/#comment-1190</guid>
		<description>[...] greater? What happens when budget-constrained agency starts turning toward “fully public” cloud services for their infrastructure or application needs, and discontinue lucrative infrastructure maintenance [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] greater? What happens when budget-constrained agency starts turning toward “fully public” cloud services for their infrastructure or application needs, and discontinue lucrative infrastructure maintenance [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
