<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Public Data: Threat or Opportunity for Data.gov?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/04/30/google-public-data-threat-or-opportunity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/04/30/google-public-data-threat-or-opportunity/</link>
	<description>A member of the Gartner Blog Network</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 14:26:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Government transparency starts with data.gov &#124; Fairfield Voice</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/04/30/google-public-data-threat-or-opportunity/comment-page-1/#comment-935</link>
		<dc:creator>Government transparency starts with data.gov &#124; Fairfield Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 05:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/?p=375#comment-935</guid>
		<description>[...] make things wonderful for everyone&#8221; shenanigans and released Google Public Data (Gartner Blog talks about this a bit). The sweet thing here is that it&#8217;s one step ahead (sort of) of the Sunlight + Data.gov path. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] make things wonderful for everyone&#8221; shenanigans and released Google Public Data (Gartner Blog talks about this a bit). The sweet thing here is that it&#8217;s one step ahead (sort of) of the Sunlight + Data.gov path. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Microsoft Joins Google and Amazon in the Rush to Open Government</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/04/30/google-public-data-threat-or-opportunity/comment-page-1/#comment-843</link>
		<dc:creator>Microsoft Joins Google and Amazon in the Rush to Open Government</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 21:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/?p=375#comment-843</guid>
		<description>[...] the announcements from Google and Amazon, both of which I have covered in previous posts, it is now Microsoft’s turn to play in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the announcements from Google and Amazon, both of which I have covered in previous posts, it is now Microsoft’s turn to play in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amazon Public Data: Another Nail in Data.gov&#8217;s Coffin?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/04/30/google-public-data-threat-or-opportunity/comment-page-1/#comment-828</link>
		<dc:creator>Amazon Public Data: Another Nail in Data.gov&#8217;s Coffin?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 16:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/?p=375#comment-828</guid>
		<description>[...] Google, also Amazon is creating vast repositories of public data pulled from data sources managed by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google, also Amazon is creating vast repositories of public data pulled from data sources managed by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christian</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/04/30/google-public-data-threat-or-opportunity/comment-page-1/#comment-810</link>
		<dc:creator>Christian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 05:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/?p=375#comment-810</guid>
		<description>In a related topic, there is something to be said for the collective intelligence of web searches. Google&#039;s data on the swine-flu led the data from the CDC by two weeks:

http://www.gauravbhalla.com/2009/04/collective-intelligence-of-web-search-logs.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a related topic, there is something to be said for the collective intelligence of web searches. Google&#8217;s data on the swine-flu led the data from the CDC by two weeks:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gauravbhalla.com/2009/04/collective-intelligence-of-web-search-logs.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.gauravbhalla.com/2009/04/collective-intelligence-of-web-search-logs.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Robertson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/2009/04/30/google-public-data-threat-or-opportunity/comment-page-1/#comment-807</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Robertson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 15:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.gartner.com/andrea_dimaio/?p=375#comment-807</guid>
		<description>Or alternatively, DATA.GOV could resolve into multiple external providers that actually host COPIES of the data (rather than going back to the original source), that in turn could be accessed by Google and others for cool graphics and other analysis work.  Why should the US Gov&#039;t host ANY of this for direct access -- why not just distribute the data regularly to commercial and academic sites (like say JPL does for those huge NASA satellite photos of Saturn and so on).  

The only real worry would be that the data set would be CHANGED in the copy, but in the end greater access will trump this risk factor IMHO.  You could always do a final run of your analysis against the OFFICIAL site as a final check to be sure this problem didn&#039;t happen to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or alternatively, DATA.GOV could resolve into multiple external providers that actually host COPIES of the data (rather than going back to the original source), that in turn could be accessed by Google and others for cool graphics and other analysis work.  Why should the US Gov&#8217;t host ANY of this for direct access &#8212; why not just distribute the data regularly to commercial and academic sites (like say JPL does for those huge NASA satellite photos of Saturn and so on).  </p>
<p>The only real worry would be that the data set would be CHANGED in the copy, but in the end greater access will trump this risk factor IMHO.  You could always do a final run of your analysis against the OFFICIAL site as a final check to be sure this problem didn&#8217;t happen to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

